Story

RFP: Architectural Historian Services

Request for Proposals: Architectural
Historian Services

DOWNLOAD PDF

THE MONTPELIER FOUNDATION
Orange, VA
Original Issue:October 6, 2025
Updated Issue: October 21, 2025 (updated timeline) 

The Montpelier Foundation (TMF) is seeking written proposals from qualified firms/providers to oversee the preservation and restoration of an 1810 garden temple and below-grade icehouse on the historic estate of James Madison. 

BACKGROUND: 

The Montpelier Foundation has been awarded a $552,204 grant from the Department of the Interior to support the preservation and restoration of the Temple at James Madison’s Montpelier. The Temple preservation project is being supported in part by a Semiquincentennial grant from the Historic Preservation Fund administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. 

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: 

PREFERRED QUALIFICATIONS: 

  • Experience directing federal historic preservation grant management and compliance 
  • Experience with bidding and contracting preservation and restoration contractors and vendors 
  • Experience in preservation planning and administration, historic site management, and/or historical research and evaluation 
  • Expertise in 18th– and 19th-century American architecture 

SCOPE OF WORK: 

  • Oversee and coordinate the grant scope of work (See Attachment A) 
  • Serve as the primary expert on complying with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation 
  • Consult with the Grant Officer to ensure approval and compliance with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation 
  • Review and refine preservation site work plan, timeline, and sequencing 
  • Consult with the National Trust for Historic Preservation (NTHP) on material changes in compliance with the co-stewardship agreement between TMF and the NTHP 
  • Surveying and documentation 
  • Overseeing the bidding and contracting of site work professionals and vendors in compliance with 2 CFR 200 Subpart D. (Note that budgeted site work items fall below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.) 
  • Creation of a maintenance plan 
  • Supporting the documentation and reporting for federal grant compliance and historic record in conjunction with TMF staff 

TIMELINE AND BUDGET 

Length of contract will run from the earliest date of contracting through August 28, 2029. The maximum contract amount is $80,000. 

EVALUATION CRITERIA 

Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the following criteria: 

  • Whether the consultant meets or exceeds the minimum and preferred qualifications; 
  • The ability of the Offeror to perform the work or provide the services promptly or within the time specified, without delay or interference; 
  • The character, integrity, reputation, judgement, experience, and efficiency of the Offeror, and; 
  • The quality of performance of previous contracts or services. 

Note: The Offeror is cautioned that it is the Offeror’s sole responsibility to submit information related to the evaluation categories. TMF is under no obligation to solicit such information, if it is not included in the Offeror’s original proposal. Failure to provide such information may have an adverse impact on the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal. 

EVALUATION PROCESS 

TMF will consider a proposal nonresponsive when critical information is lacking, or the submission represents a major deviation from the requirements of this RFP. Minor omissions or informalities may be waived at the sole option and discretion of TMF. TMF also reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, make no award or multiple awards as result of this solicitation. Responsive proposals will be evaluated in the following manner: 

A. An Evaluation Committee will review and rank all proposals individually on their technical merits and according to the criteria established in Section 5 of this RFP. The Committee may contact Offerors if any clarification is needed on the proposal. 

B. Offerors whose proposals are ranked the highest by the Evaluation Committee may be asked to participate in an interview process to ensure a mutual understanding of both the TMF’s requirements and the Offeror’s proposal. Interviews may be conducted either in person or by telephone. However, the Committee may decide that interviews are not necessary and make recommendations for award based on the information provided in the proposal. 

C. The firm that provides the TMF with the most reliable and cost-effective goods and/or services based on the established evaluation criteria will be recommended. 

PROPOSED TIME SCHEDULE 

  • Original RFP Issue Date: October 6, 2025 
  • Updated RFP Issue Date: October 21, 2025 
  • RFP Close Date: November 3, 2025 
  • RFP Evaluation: November 14, 2025 
  • Review of Recommended Offeror by Grant Funder: November 17, 2025 
  • Notice of Award: November 20, 2025 

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES 

Please send submissions to Dr. Kelley Fanto Deetz at kdeetz@montpelier.org by 11:59PM EST on November 3, 2025. 

Attachment A: Background on the Temple Preservation at James Madison’s Montpelier 

Significance 

The Temple at James Madison’s Montpelier is a singular resource that encapsulates the spirit and values of early American nationhood. Owned by the National Trust for Historic Preservation and co-stewarded by The Montpelier Foundation, this iconic structure stands as a testament to the intellectual and political currents that led to our nation’s founding. Constructed in 1810–11, the Temple’s neoclassical design—with its Greco-Roman influences, half-dome roof, and elegantly carved wood friezes—evokes the ancient republics that inspired the framework for the United States Federal Government. This aesthetic was decorative and imbued with meaning; it symbolized the ideals of liberty, civic virtue, and self-governance that shaped the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, for which James Madison is renowned as the “Father of the Constitution.”

a. Description of the Resource: The Temple is a neoclassical monopteron—characterized by a distinctive half-dome roof supported by a series of pillars—that originally functioned as both a symbolic and utilitarian structure. The wood components, including intricately carved friezes and original shingle laths, articulate a design intent rooted in classical aesthetics. Madison’s 24‑foot domed garden temple has survived through seven different owners. Strategically located at the junction of major roads, it has long dominated the view of the plantation for approaching visitors, as evidenced by its inclusion in historic sketches and watercolors by visitors to the Madisons’ home.

Historic sketches and photographs show the original below‐grade lattice entrance to an innovative icehouse. While the below-grade entrance was backfilled by later private owners, the ice pit is still preserved with Madson-era masonry intact. An icehouse allowed for the preservation of meats and other perishables during hot Virginia summers, and provided ice year-round for chilled drinks and desserts. James Madison’s wife, Dolley Madison, is often credited for popularizing ice cream in the United States after serving it at Madison’s inaugural ball, at her parlor socials in Washington, D.C. during Madison’s presidency, and at Montpelier. Visitors to Montpelier during Madison’s lifetime often recounted the novelty of being served ice cream in their letters and diaries. More than a charming detail, the icehouse symbolizes the profound diplomatic and social role First Ladies serve—a tradition Dolley Madison helped to define. Congruent with these modifications, the Temple remains a potent symbol of early American ideals; its design not only reflects the contributions of James and Dolley Madison, but also provides insight into daily life and society during the formative years of our nation.

b. Current Designation: Montpelier, including the Temple, is recognized as a National Historic Landmark and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

c. Integrity: The Temple’s presence on the Montpelier estate, along with the main house preserved as a presidential house museum, makes it an essential piece of the larger interpretive landscape that communicates the nation’s founding history. The Temple’s historic integrity is immediately evident as a prominent feature on the historic landscape of Montpelier, though the fabric of the structure has been compromised by environmental and anthropogenic factors over time.

In 2015, The Montpelier Foundation secured private funding to complete the emergency stabilization of the wooden roof and below-ground structural masonry. This phase included roof repairs and restoration, emergency masonry repair and grading to remediate water infiltration, and archaeological excavations to reveal original grade and investigate for a complete set of restoration drawings and specifications. This first phase of the Temple’s restoration ensured structural stability and prepared for a future completion of a comprehensive restoration.

In completing the restoration of the Temple, The Montpelier Foundation seeks not only to repair physical deterioration but also to reinvigorate its interpretive potential. This resource, imbued with both symbolic and practical historical significance, remains central to understanding the architectural and cultural milieu of early America. The restoration will reaffirm its status as a living monument to the ideals that continue to influence our national identity, ensuring that the Temple remains a vital educational and cultural asset for future generations.

NEED 

a. Urgency/Threat: The primary concern is the degradation of the pillars that support the domed roof. The application of Portland cement stucco on these pillars in the 1910s trapped moisture, causing significant decay in the original brickwork—a challenge that has been compounded by the 2011 Virginia earthquake, which further stressed the structure. Concurrent with the Portland stucco on the columns was the replacement of the wood floor of the Temple with a concrete slab in the 1910s. Today this slab is fully integrated with the Madison-era masonry and cannot be removed. Our plans call for the covering of the concrete floor with black locust flooring (described in documents of the 1810s) to restore the structure’s Madison-era appearance. Moreover, the functional integrity of the Temple has been altered by the backfilling of the icehouse entrance—a modification that obscures an essential aspect of its historical use. Nevertheless, the overall layout, spatial relationship, and symbolic design of the Temple continue to convey the architectural intentions and civic values of the early American republic. The planned restoration will prioritize the conservation of original materials and craftsmanship, thereby enhancing its integrity and ensuring that the Temple’s historical narrative is communicated with authenticity and clarity for generations to come. The current condition of the Temple is visibly deteriorated. The wood elements, most especially the entablature band below the dome, is critical to the Temple’s distinct architectural character, but compromised by prolonged exposure to weather and wildlife. This decay not only threatens the aesthetic appeal of the structure but also its overall stability. The cumulative effect of these threats is a rapidly diminishing integrity that, if left unaddressed, will lead to irreversible loss of historical material and the dilution of the Temple’s interpretive power.

b. Need: The Temple is at a critical juncture—all of the Madison-era elements are intact, but further degradation will result in irreparable structural failure. This would result in the loss of what architectural and landscape historians have deemed one of the most architecturally sophisticated garden temples that is known to have been built in the early American republic. The loss of historical features, such as the neoclassical masonry pillars wood friezes, and the icehouse entrance, would strip the site of its multidimensional historical significance, weakening its contribution to the collective understanding of America’s founding.

c. Mitigation: Through specialized carpentry repairs, the decorative entablatures will be restored using historically accurate methods and materials, preserving the maximum amount of original material as possible. A historically appropriate black-locust floor will be laid on the concrete floor that provides the Temple’s structural integrity. Masonry experts will conduct extensive repairs on the pillars, reinforcing their structural integrity and preserving their historical appearance. The project includes the careful excavation and restoration of the backfilled icehouse entrance, a step that will reinstate the Temple’s original function and contextual authenticity. Additionally, the incorporation of ADA-compliant pathways will not only enhance accessibility but also provide a controlled and protected means for public interaction with the site. These proposed visitor pathways will follow the historic road traces discovered during previous archaeological investigations. The project’s phased approach ensures that each critical component is addressed systematically, mitigating ongoing deterioration and preserving the resource’s historical narrative.

d. Sequence: This restoration effort represents the logical next step in the long-term preservation strategy for Montpelier. The project begins with the removal of inaccurate or inappropriate treatments, such as the modern stucco on the pillars, which is trapping moisture that threatens the historic masonry. Decaying wood and weathered masonry will be either restored or, if not structurally salvageable, will be replaced. Once the immediate threats are mitigated, the restoration will proceed with the functional and interpretive enhancements, including the excavation of the icehouse entrance and the installation of ADA-compliant visitor pathways. Each phase builds upon the success of the previous one, ensuring that the Temple’s historical integrity is not only restored but also safeguarded against future threats. The successful completion of this project is essential to ensure that the Temple continues to serve as a vital educational and cultural resource, conveying the rich narrative of America’s early history to generations to come.

Feasibility 

a. Scope of Work:

  • Carpentry Repairs: Specialized carpenters will repair and restore the entablature, fabricate and install the Temple floor and icehouse door using historically accurate materials and techniques to ensure fidelity to the original design.
  • Masonry Repairs: Skilled masons will address deterioration in the pillars, reinforcing and conserving these elements to maintain both their structural and aesthetic roles.
  • Restoration of the Icehouse Entrance: The project includes the excavation and careful restoration of the backfilled icehouse entrance, reinstating its original function as part of the Temple’s integrated design.
  • ADA-Compliant Visitor Pathways: New pathways will be constructed to meet ADA standards, ensuring that the restored site is accessible to all visitors while harmonizing with the historic landscape.
  • Archaeological Excavation: Prior to major restoration work, an archaeological excavation of historic pathways will be conducted to document, confirm, and preserve the site’s archaeological record prior to any below-grade disturbance required for visitor accessibility.

b. Inclusion of Partners in Planning: The Montpelier Foundation will consult with the National Trust for Historic Preservation [the National Trust], owner and co-steward of the Temple and historic site, to finalize the plans for any material changes to the Temple. The Montpelier Foundation will abide by the co-stewardship agreement to maintain and preserve the Temple, consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Archaeology and Historic Preservation.

c. Timeline: The proposed grant project is slated to begin in October 2025 and be completed by October 2028. The pre- preservation phase will span the first six months. Historic preservation and restoration work will then be implemented in sequential phases over the next two years. The final phase, including the completion of accessibility enhancements and interpretive improvements, will be wrapped up within the three-year period. This timeline allows sufficient time for meticulous restoration while meeting all federal guidelines and compliance.

d. Budget Justification: Funds will be allocated for specialized labor (carpenters, masons, and historic landscape experts), historically appropriate materials, historic landscape restoration measures, and accessibility improvements. Each cost element is grounded in the requirements to adhere to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation, as well as federal procurement standards outlined in 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D.

e. Professional Involvement: A consulting architectural historian will be contracted to oversee and execute the grant project.

Archaeology will be completed by Montpelier’s in-house department of Archaeology and Landscape Restoration. Specialized contractors will be procured to provide preservation carpentry and masonry in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. A contractor will be secured to complete ADA-compliant visitor pathways in consultation with the Department of Archaeology and Landscape Restoration to comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.

f. Measurable Outcomes: Success will be measured through a series of quantifiable outcomes:

  • Material assessments will be conducted before and after the restoration to verify improvements.
  • The restored architectural elements, historic icehouse entrance, and immediate surrounding historic landscape will be documented through high-resolution imaging and detailed reports.
  • The installation of ADA-compliant pathways will be verified through compliance testing. Regular progress reports, milestone reviews, and a final evaluation will ensure accountability and provide transparency regarding the achievement of all stated goals.

GIVE TO MONTPELIER

As the lifelong home of James Madison, Father of the Constitution and Architect of the Bill of Rights, Montpelier's mission is to communicate Madison's role in creating our modern, democratic government.

Why did James Madison have a temple in his front yard? He didn’t come here to pray– it wasn’t that kind of temple. Maybe it reminded him of the ancient Roman temple where the “flame of Liberty” was kept burning. But what does “liberty” mean? Does it mean that you can do anything you want? Whenever you want? Of course not! Can you imagine a whole country of people doing whatever they want? Imagine how quickly things would get out of control!

Things were getting out of control after the colonies broke away from the King of England during the American Revolution. The new states didn’t have a good system to govern themselves. They needed a rulebook. They needed a constitution.

Enter James Madison. He read lots of books right here at Montpelier that gave him ideas about the rules that other countries played by, if they didn’t have a king. Madison went to Philadelphia and worked with people from many different states to write a Constitution. His ideas were so helpful that now he is known as the “Father of the Constitution.”

What does the Constitution say about who makes the rules? Instead of a king, it’s “We The People.” The Constitution gives citizens the FREEDOM to govern themselves, to choose their own leaders, and to make their own laws and rules. The Constitution also protects the people’s rights like freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press.

At first the Constitution didn’t allow everyone to participate in government, but over the past 240 years, Americans have made changes — things called Amendments– that let more people have rights, and vote, and run for office. Now “We the People” means just about “All the People!”

The United States Constitution is the modern world’s longest lasting Constitution, and many countries have used it as a model when they wrote their own Constitutions . And just think: it all began right here, on this plantation, Montpelier. That’s how Montpelier made its mark on the world!

Madison was the 4th President, but can you guess six other Presidents who came to Montpelier?

Madison’s best friends were Presidents 3 and 5. Maybe you’ll visit their homes, Monticello and Highland. Who were they? … Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe!

President Number 7 visited Montpelier in 1832. Someone in your family might have his picture right now – he’s on the $20 bill. Who was he? … Andrew Jackson!

Three other Presidents visited Montpelier after Madison’s lifetime. They might be harder to guess, but let’s give it a try.

President Number 19 came in 1878, and gave a speech in praise of Madison and the Constitution. In fact, his last name rhymes with “praise.” Any guesses?… Rutherford B. Hayes!

President Number 26 came to Montpelier on Thanksgiving Day 1907, when the duPonts lived here. A toy bear is named for him. Who was he? … Teddy Roosevelt!

And finally, President Number 41 came here in 1991 for the 200th anniversary of the Bill of Rights. His son was a President too. Can you guess? … George H. W. Bush!

That’s a lot of Presidents who made their mark on Montpelier. And today you’re here! Now you’re part of Montpelier’s story too.

Sometimes the people who lived at Montpelier chose to make their mark, but other times they were forced to make their mark. From the time President Madison’s grandparents came to Montpelier, it was a plantation––a huge farm–where enslaved people of African descent grew crops like tobacco, wheat, and corn and did many other jobs to make money for the Madison family. People who were enslaved had many skills and worked hard, but they didn’t get the benefit.

It was not only enslaved adults that labored for the Madisons, but enslaved children were also forced to do a lot of different tasks such as gathering firewood, helping in the kitchens, hauling water, cleaning stables, and… making bricks. Look at this huge house in front of you— each and every one of these bricks was made one at a time, by hand. On plantations, brick-making was often a task given to enslaved children. They pressed wet clay into rectangular-shaped molds. Then the bricks were left in the sun to “bake,” and once enough bricks were made they “fired” them to harden them. Have you ever pressed your fingers into wet clay? What happens when you do that? Your fingerprints make a mark. That’s exactly what happened here when enslaved people were making bricks to build this house. As you walk around the house, see if you can find any fingerprints in the bricks. These fingerprints remind us that nearly 300 enslaved people, of all ages, made their mark on Montpelier.

Since enslaved adults and children did most of the work at Montpelier, they didn’t have a lot of time for fun. What did they do when they did have a little time to themselves? Archaeologists found artifacts – marbles, doll parts, and toy wagon wheels – that tell us that enslaved children sometimes played with toys. Other artifacts, like musical instruments called jaw harps, tell us that enslaved people made music. Many of the activities that enslaved people probably enjoyed, like storytelling or dancing, didn’t leave artifacts in the ground.

The Madisons had much more time to themselves. Written records describe one of their favorite ways to have fun: parties.

Dolley Madison wrote about a barbecue picnic that she and James hosted on the 4th of July 1816. Ninety guests sat at tables set up on the lawn by enslaved people. Enslaved waiters served them roasted meats and punch, and most likely, fresh vegetables from the garden.

We don’t have a written account of what enslaved people had to do to get ready for that party, but historians found one written account that gives us a clue. In 1824, the famous General Lafayette visited Montpelier. A young enslaved maid named Ailsey Payne was there. Years later, she gave a newspaper reporter her eyewitness account. She saw so many horse drawn carriages she could hardly count them. Young enslaved men rode and led the horses. Enslaved people stored all kinds of food and meat in the icehouse. Ailsey Payne helped clean every inch of the House and shined all of the glass, silver, and china.

Ailsey Payne left her mark on Montpelier by telling her story! Will you tell someone about your visit?

Have you ever been asked to “sweep the floor?” Maybe it’s your chore to sweep up the crumbs that fall to the floor after dinner (if you don’t have a dog to do it for you). But have you ever been asked to “sweep the yard?” Archaeologists at Montpelier believe that enslaved people who lived here did just that! They used brooms to sweep away all of the grass and weeds. The ground would have been like a smooth, hard, clay floor.

Sweeping the yard cut down pests and unwanted creatures like ticks, mice, and snakes. It was a natural way of getting rid of pests that ruined food or caused disease.

The building in front of you was once a kitchen. Enslaved cooks labored here from long before sunup to long after sundown to prepare meals for the Madison family and their guests. They could build their hot cooking fires outside in the swept yard so that the work was more tolerable.

Except for the two smokehouses, the buildings here were homes for enslaved families who mostly worked inside the Madisons’ House. Their homes could be crowded, dark, and unbearably hot in summer. Having a smooth, swept yard allowed them to move many of their indoor activities outdoors. Imagine how busy this place would have been!

The ancestors of enslaved people at Montpelier had also swept their yards in Africa.They passed their wisdom along to their descendants. This is just one example of how enslaved people and their ancestors left their mark on Montpelier.

Do you have pets?

The Madisons had a pet parrot named Polly, but most of the animals at Montpelier weren’t pets – they were working animals. Horses pulled plows that made the ground ready for planting wheat or corn. Horses also pulled wagons, loaded with barrels of Montpelier tobaccos or wheat flour, to market in Fredericksburg and Richmond, and brought supplies back. Aleck was an enslaved wagoner who drove and cared for the horses. On one trip to Fredericksburg, Aleck had to borrow 50 cents to go to the blacksmith for new horseshoes so the horses could make the trip back.

Besides horses, there were cows and sheep and pigs at Montpelier. Some animals were raised for food. Sheep were also raised for their woolly coats. Enslaved women spun the wool into yarn or thread, and weavers like Reuben, Amy, and Harriet wove it into cloth.

James Madison wanted to improve the American breeds of cows and sheep. He bought some Merino sheep, because their wool was so good. A friend gave him some Devon calves as a gift, because they were a better breed of cows.

Animals made their mark at Montpelier – and so did the people who worked with them and took care of them!

How do we know what we know about the past? We can’t ask the people who used to live here— they’re long gone. We have to piece together clues from “primary sources”— letters, journals, diaries, paintings, and newspapers. History is kind of like a giant jigsaw puzzle— as we put the pieces together, a picture of the past emerges!

The very first people to live at Montpelier were Native Americans, or Indigenous people. They didn’t leave written records behind, but they did leave artifacts– objects that were made or shaped or used with their own hands. People who study artifacts are called archaeologists. Montpelier’s archaeologists have discovered artifacts that are about 2000 years old. That tells us that Indigenous people were here, thousands of years before the Madisons, or enslaved people, ever set foot on this land.

The Manahoac tribe were the native people living on this land just before the Madisons arrived here. Artifacts show us that the Manahoac made their mark by making their homes here for periods of time. The artifacts found near President Madison’s house, and near his grandparent’s house at Mount Pleasant–objects such as ceramics, stone tools, and projectile points— show us that the Manahoac thought these were good places to live too.

Did you know that there are descendants of Manahoac people living and making their mark in Virginia today? They are now part of the Monocan tribe, one of the 7 Federally recognized tribes in Virginia.

Some of the people that left their mark on Montpelier are buried here in the Madison family Cemetery. Can you guess which of these gravestones marks the final resting place of James Madison? It’s the tallest monument, and it’s called an obelisk. Today it’s easy to spot Madison’s grave, but if you visited Montpelier in the first 20 years after his death, you wouldn’t know where he was buried unless you were a member of his family. James Madison passed away on June 28, 1836, and two days later, he was buried here, in an unmarked grave.

Why would a president of the United States be buried in an unmarked grave? Today we usually place a marker at the head of a grave, but in the 1700s and 1800s people didn’t always do that, especially in a family cemetery where everyone knew where their family members were buried. If you count the gravestones you’ll find that there are about 30, but we know there are about 100 Madison family members buried here.

It wasn’t until 20 years later that people, outside of the Madison family, decided to place the large gravestone to honor the “Father of the Constitution.” Now, ready for a creepy story? Before placing the gravestone, a deep foundation had to be dug to a depth below James Madison’s coffin. “The boards placed above the coffin had decayed…and the coffin lid was slightly out of place…” so the men digging the foundation opened the coffin lid and “looked in upon the remains…” of James Madison!

Some people made their mark at Montpelier by leaving it.

Anthony was just 17 years old when he decided to make his escape from Montpelier. He had been enslaved here all his life, working in the Madisons’ house, and he was ready to take a big risk for freedom. James Madison’s father placed an ad in the newspaper to say that Anthony had escaped. The ad said that Anthony had light hair and gray eyes, and it described his coats, pants, striped overalls, hat, and buckled shoes. The ad offered a reward for capturing Anthony.

Anthony didn’t want to be caught, so he told people his name was Robert Jones. But one year after he escaped, Anthony was found, about 70 miles from Montpelier. He told the men who captured him that he had traveled to port cities in Virginia, to Philadelphia, and even the West Indies.

But the very next day, Anthony escaped again. He managed to get papers that said he was a free man named Billy Willis. There was a rumor that he was heading to Philadelphia. The Madisons never heard from him again. What happened next is a mystery. But Anthony left his mark by taking a big risk for freedom.

The duPont Family bought Montpelier in 1901 and made many changes to the House and the property. Did you see the racetrack on your way in today? You might even have seen some horses!

Marion duPont Scott loved horses and horse racing. She helped make Montpelier one of the most important horse training centers in America. When three of her favorite horses passed away, she had them buried here and put up these markers to remember them.

Perhaps her favorite horse was Battleship. He was so small that people called him the “American Pony,” but Marion DuPont Scott knew that he had big talent. She sent him across the ocean to race in the British “Grand National,” an important steeplechase race that is still run today. The race is over 4 miles long, and the horses have to jump 30 fences! Many people thought that a small horse like Battleship couldn’t possibly win, but in 1938 he surprised them all! To this day, he is still the smallest horse ever to win the British Grand National. You might say that Battleship left his hoofprints on the history of horse racing!

Marion duPont Scott left another mark on Montpelier. She wanted to share Montpelier and its story with everyone. Thanks to her, you can visit Montpelier today!

Lots of people made their mark on Montpelier. But there are two people you might already know: James and Dolley Madison!

How did James Madison make his mark? He was a Virginia lawmaker, a US Congressman, the Secretary of State, and our 4th President! (Not all at the same time.)

But most importantly, Madison was “Father of the Constitution” and “Architect of the Bill of Rights.” He didn’t write those documents all by himself, but he shared lots of good ideas that still help us govern our country. Madison got his ideas from reading books right here at Montpelier, and he made notes to take to the Constitutional Convention.

Madison could spend so much time in public service because his family had money from owning this plantation. The Madisons enslaved people who grew crops and tended animals. The enslaved people didn’t have much choice about being here, but their hard work made Madison’s career possible. The enslaved people made their mark as the “invisible Founders” of our country.

Dolley Madison made her mark too. James was shy and quiet, but Dolley liked to bring people together for dinners and parties, especially in Washington, DC. That made it easier for James to connect with other people in government.

As you explore Montpelier, see what else you’ll find out about people making their mark!

Sign Up!

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.